Home / Books / Missing Pages From Malcolm X’s Autobiography Turn Up at Auction

Missing Pages From Malcolm X’s Autobiography Turn Up at Auction

For a quarter-century, they have been the stuff of myth among scholars: three missing chapters from “The Autobiography of Malcolm X,” reputedly cut from the manuscript after his assassination in 1965 because they were deemed too incendiary.

Their possible existence was first teased at in 1992, when a private collector at an estate sale scooped up material belonging to Alex Haley, Malcolm X’s collaborator on the book, who died that year. Years later, one biographer was allowed a 15-minute look at some of the papers, but otherwise they have been mostly locked away, surrounded by a haze of carefully cultivated mystery.

But now the unpublished material, or at least some of it, has suddenly emerged and is being offered for sale Thursday afternoon at a Manhattan auction house, along with another artifact that scholars have never seen: the manuscript for the published book, which bears dense traces of Mr. Haley’s and Malcolm X’s complex negotiations over the finished text.

The manuscripts, which are being sold in connection with a complex bankruptcy proceeding involving the collector who bought them in 1992, are being included in an auction of African-American historical artifacts by Guernsey’s. The sale also includes Art Tatum’s piano; the first recording contract for the Jackson Five; and a Detroit house associated with Rosa Parks that was bought by an artist, disassembled and shipped to Germany, then shipped back again.

But it was the sale, with little advance fanfare, of the Malcolm X material that caused a stir among scholars, some of whom expressed alarm that manuscripts that had been locked away by one private collector might now just disappear into the hands of another.

Komozi Woodard, a professor of history at Sarah Lawrence College who is writing a book about the final year of Malcolm X’s life, said he was “shocked” when he learned about the auction earlier this week.

“If we’re trying to figure out where Malcolm would have taken us, some of those papers have clues to that puzzle,” he said. “Scholars are holding their breath trying to figure out when we can look at them.”

Jeanne Theoharis, a biographer of Rosa Parks who has written about conflicts with her estate over access to Parks’s archives, said auctions of historically rich material like the Malcolm X manuscripts both trade on public interest in black history and make it harder for scholars to write it.

“Such a sale rewards personal wealth over public knowledge,” she said.

Since Malcolm X’s assassination, there have been battles over the meaning of his life, in particular during the tumultuous last year, when he broke with the Nation of Islam, traveled to the Middle East and renounced racial separatism.

There have been equally fierce battles over his scattered literary remains. Papers removed from his family’s home by one of his daughters and later seized by owners of a storage facility were nearly auctioned in 2002, before scholars and family members organized an effort to have the collection placed intact at the New York Public Library’s Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture, on Malcolm X Boulevard in Harlem.

The manuscripts for “Autobiography” remained in the possession of Alex Haley, and when he died, they went to auction to settle claims against the estate. They were sold for more than $100,000 to Gregory Reed, a Detroit-area lawyer who has represented Rosa Parks and various Motown musicians.

The material landed at Guernsey’s as part of a complex bankruptcy proceeding involving Mr. Reed.

Over the years, Mr. Reed has offered teasing glimpses of the missing chapters, which he has said were titled “The Negro,” “20 Million Muslims” and “The End of Christianity.”

In the run-up to the publication of his Pulitzer Prize-winning 2011 biography of Malcolm X, the scholar Manning Marable described meeting Mr. Reed in a Detroit restaurant and being given a mere 15 minutes to look at some unpublished pages.

Dr. Marable (who died the day before his biography was published) said it was unclear why the material had been cut from the book, which was published after Malcolm X’s death. But he emphasized how the book had been profoundly shaped by Mr. Haley’s own integrationist, liberal Republican point of view.

“He was deeply hostile to Malcolm’s politics,” Dr. Marable said in a 2009 interview.

In 2010, Mr. Reed read excerpts at an event at the former Audubon Ballroom (now the Malcolm X and Dr. Betty Shabazz Center), where he promised that the three chapters would be published soon.

Mr. Woodard recalled Mr. Reed projecting images of title pages with “Urgent” written in red ink. “He had been holding this stuff hostage for decades,” he said. “I had to restrain myself from asking, ‘What part of urgent don’t you understand?’”

Zaheer Ali, who was the lead research assistant for Mr. Marable, recalled it feeling more like a tease.

“There was not much revelation,” he said. “I left thinking to myself, I don’t think this is going to be what people think it’s going to be.”

Jason Anthony, a literary agent for the Malcolm X estate, said he did not think there had been any recent discussions between Mr. Reed and the family about publishing the material.

It remains to be seen what scholars will make of the material and how it relates to Mr. Reed’s longstanding claim of having found three missing chapters.

The 241-page manuscript for the published book, held in a black binder, is missing some pages. There are a number of unpublished fragments, some of which are being sold as single pages. But only one item — a 25-page typescript with a hand-lettered title page that says “The Negro” — resembles a full chapter, leaving it unclear whether Mr. Reed’s description of three chapters was accurate.

In a telephone interview, Mr. Reed said the book manuscript was complete when he bought it. He said he could not answer questions about the supposed three missing chapters but said the material he read at the 2010 event was not the same as what he showed Dr. Marable, which he described only as “copies of certain writings.”

Many pages of the manuscript for the published book are dense with edits that show the push and pull between Haley’s revisions and queries, in black ink, and Malcolm X’s, in red. In some places, Haley urges him to pull back on the soapbox pronouncements or to tone down some of the fiercest denunciations of white people.

In others, he affirms Malcolm’s comments, as in a passage describing corruption in “some of America’s topmost white circles,” where he pencils in “I know!”

As for “The Negro,” it begins with a blast: “The Western World is sick. The American society — with the song of Christianity providing the white man with the illusion that what he has done to the black man is ‘right’ — is as sick as Babylon. And the black man here in this wilderness, the so-called ‘Negro,’ is sickest of them all.”

The text, which appears to have been written before Malcolm X’s break with the Nation of Islam, makes little reference to his own life story. Instead it gives a broad, unsparing analysis of what he considered the hypocrisies of white America and the delusions of “integrationist” blacks — a word he puts in scornful quotation marks — who seek its acceptance.

“We are like the Western deserts; tumbleweed, rolling and tumbling whichever way the white wind blows,” he writes. “And the white man is like the cactus, deeply rooted, with spines to keep us off.”

Mr. Ali, who is now an oral historian at the Brooklyn Historical Society, said that the manuscripts, taken together, could help shed light on the way Malcolm X’s purpose for the autobiography changed over time, as his ideas, and his relationship with the Nation of Islam, changed.

As for cutting “The Negro” and other alterations, he said he took a “softer” view of Mr. Haley’s editing than Dr. Marable had.

“Haley was trying to write a story using the conventions of narrative,” he said. “At some points, his problem with Malcolm was that he was speechifying. But Malcolm’s objective was to speechify, to present his arguments.”

Read Automatic By TracePress.com Company
if this Post need Change Tell Us!

About sara

Check Also

Congressional Bloodshed: The Run-Up to the Civil War

Offended Southern honor also lay behind the most famous violent congressional incident of the era, …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

قالب وردپرس